IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/revdev/v30y2025i1_supplps10-s24.html

Two Traditions in the Conceptualisation of Competition

Author

Listed:
  • S. Limakumba Walling

Abstract

This article adopts a history of economic thought approach in examining the conceptualisation of competition and its development and role in different theoretical systems. Taking the nonlinear view of knowledge, this article identifies two distinct and different theoretical systems—classical political economy and neoclassical economics (brought through the marginalist revolution in the late 19th century). This article argues that classical political economy had a notion of competition as a dynamic process irrespective of the market structure (number of participants in the market). For classical economists, competition was conceptualised as the perfect mobility of resources, establishing a tendency towards uniform prices or rates of return to commodities, assets and labour that are identical in all economically relevant respects. Competition was operationalised through the theoretical idea of natural prices; in fact, competition is the method of abstraction employed by classical economists to study basic economic processes. Meanwhile, in neoclassical economics, the concept of perfect competition depends on the number of participants in the market, with imperfections introduced only as deviations from the idealised benchmark.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Limakumba Walling, 2025. "Two Traditions in the Conceptualisation of Competition," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 30(1_suppl), pages 10-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:revdev:v:30:y:2025:i:1_suppl:p:s10-s24
    DOI: 10.1177/09722661241304858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722661241304858
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722661241304858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lefteris Tsoulfidis & Persefoni Tsaliki, 2019. "Classical Political Economics and Modern Capitalism," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-17967-0, March.
    2. Israel M. Kirzner, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 60-85, March.
    3. Shaikh, Anwar, 2016. "Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199390632.
    4. Paul J. McNulty, 1968. "Economic Theory and the Meaning of Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(4), pages 639-656.
    5. Paul J. McNulty, 1967. "A Note on the History of Perfect Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(4), pages 395-395.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    2. Enrico Sergio Levrero & Giacomo Sbrenna, 2022. "Some Factors Affecting US Capital Profitability over the Last Decades," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 16(2), pages 77-101, December.
    3. Boundi-Chraki, Fahd & Perrotini-Hernández, Ignacio, 2021. "Absolute cost advantage and sectoral competitiveness: Empirical evidence from NAFTA and the European Union," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 162-173.
    4. Oberholzer, Basil, 2023. "Post-growth transition, working time reduction, and the question of profits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Mihaela Iacob & Georgiana-Camelia Cre?an, 2017. "“Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 544-544, May.
    6. Stephen Martin, 2012. "Market Structure and Market Performance," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 40(2), pages 87-108, March.
    7. Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2015. "Contending Conceptions of Competition and the Role of Regulating Capital," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(1), pages 15-31, March.
    8. M. S. Addleson, 1984. "General Equilibrium and ‘Competition’: On Competition as Strategy," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 52(2), pages 104-113, June.
    9. Cajas-Guijarro, John & Pérez-Almeida, Bryan, 2021. "Comercio, sobreexplotación laboral y ciclos en la periferia: una propuesta teórica y el caso ecuatoriano desde un modelo PVAR. || Trade, super-exploitation of labor power and cycles in the periphery: a theoretical proposal and the Ecuadorian case thr," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 31(1), pages 161-197, June.
    10. Nikolaos Th. Chatzarakis, 2021. "Revisiting the role and consequences of Econophysics from a Marxian perspective," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(1), pages 45-68, June.
    11. Fletcher Baragar, 2020. "Books Received (as of Winter/Spring 2020)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 175-179, March.
    12. Alex Gymnopoulos & Thanos Poulakis & Haris Poulakis & Nikolaos Chatzarakis, 2021. "Investigating the Greek Unemployment from a Classical Perspective," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(1), pages 69-91, June.
    13. Roberto Leombruni, 2002. "The Methodological Status of Agent-Based Simulations," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 19, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    14. Chatzarakis, Nikolaos & Tsaliki, Persefoni, 2022. "Harrodian Instability: A Marxian Perspective," MPRA Paper 113852, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Luca Zamparelli, 2009. "Average cost and marginal cost pricing in Marshall: Textual analysis and interpretation," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 665-694.
    16. Nikolaos, Chatzarakis & Tsaliki, Persefoni, 2021. "The dynamics of capital accumulation in Marx and Solow," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 148-158.
    17. Dupont, Brandon & Durham, Yvonne, 2021. "Adam Smith and the not so invisible hand: A revision for the undergraduate classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    18. Ufuk Akcigit & Murat Celik & Daron Acemoglu, 2014. "Young, Restless and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations," 2014 Meeting Papers 377, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    19. Will Mitchell & Zhiyan Wu & Garry D. Bruton & Dhruba Kumar Gautam, 2022. "Microlevel Analysis of Institutional Intermediation in a Rudimentary Market-Based Economy: Entrepreneurship in Kathmandu’s Indrachok Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2106-2134, November.
    20. Loïc Sauce, 2017. "Market process(es) and (un)knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 305-321, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:revdev:v:30:y:2025:i:1_suppl:p:s10-s24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.