IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v30y1998i2p87-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accumulation, Technical Change, and Prisoners' Dilemmas: A Rejoinder to Frank Thompson

Author

Listed:
  • David Laibman

    (Department of Economics, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY 11210)

Abstract

Frank Thompson has proposed (this Review, 30(1): 90-107) that accumulation can cause the profit rate to fall (by forcing the wage rate to rise), but that biased technical change, by itself, can only cause the profit rate to rise (by forcing the wage rate to fall). By contrast, this paper argues that: 1) accumulation pressure generates cycles in the profit rate, but no trend; 2) biased technical change may (and in most circumstances is likely to) produce cycles around a falling trend. This is because the fall in the profit rate is associated with a rise in the profit share, and this latter rise reduces the degree of the optimal bias sought by capitalists and therefore establishes dynamic balance in the labor market at a lower rate of profit. Marx's story is therefore confirmed in a nuanced and conditional manner that focuses attention on the empirical conditions and social relations pro-ducing this particular contradictory law of motion.

Suggested Citation

  • David Laibman, 1998. "Accumulation, Technical Change, and Prisoners' Dilemmas: A Rejoinder to Frank Thompson," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 87-101, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:30:y:1998:i:2:p:87-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/30/2/87.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:30:y:1998:i:2:p:87-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.