IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v29y1997i4p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Downsizing and the New American Workplace: Rethinking the High Performance Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Biewener

    (Department of Sociology, UC-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, biewener@star.net)

Abstract

This article considers the way new work practices associated with the high performance work model are being combined with downsizing measures as part of contemporary competitive strategy in American workplaces. In general, downsizing measures and high performance practices are treated as mutually exclusive trajectories of corporate reorganization. Yet in the current economy companies may, in fact, use a mix of approaches as they develop strategies for work reorganization. The case study presented here, based on research in the telecommunication industry, suggests that practices such as cross-functional teaming and multi-skilling can be intimately linked to a strategy oriented toward down-sizing. As such, these practices are not always associated with broad skill enhancement; rather, they can result in a more general tendency toward skill erosion and automation. At the same time, downsizing itself can be used to weaken traditional structures of employment relationships, thereby facilitating the use of high performance practices which emphasize cross-functional flexibility and broad job tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Biewener, 1997. "Downsizing and the New American Workplace: Rethinking the High Performance Paradigm," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:29:y:1997:i:4:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/29/4/1.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:29:y:1997:i:4:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.