IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v38y2026i1p6-41.html

How to integrate theories of norm emergence. The example of James S. Coleman’s and Robert C. Ellickson’s theories

Author

Listed:
  • Karl-Dieter Opp

Abstract

There are different theories that aim at explaining the emergence of norms (defined as statements about oughtness). It is not known which theory is superior. This paper is a first attempt to propose a new integrated norm theory, based on two plausible and widely accepted theories: James Coleman’s and Robert Ellickson’s theories about the origin of norms. After discussing methodological issues referring, among other things, to arguments for integrating the theories, the new theory is proposed. Among other things, it does not only explain norms as effects of externalities (as Coleman’s theory), but also as signals to express distinctiveness and group commitment (with the example of the Hells Angels motor club). Coleman’s theory is further modified by integrating from Ellickson’s theory a set of variables that intervene between the exogenous variable “close social relationships†and the origin of norms. The model includes transaction costs and cooperation as intervening factors. Furthermore, “overarching norms†(from Ellickson’s research) is added as a new condition for the origin of norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl-Dieter Opp, 2026. "How to integrate theories of norm emergence. The example of James S. Coleman’s and Robert C. Ellickson’s theories," Rationality and Society, , vol. 38(1), pages 6-41, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:6-41
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631251390297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631251390297
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631251390297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Przepiorka, Wojtek, 2025. "Applications of Signaling Theory in Sociological Scholarship," OSF Preprints hwkny_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Elinor Ostrom, 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 137-158, Summer.
    3. Przepiorka, Wojtek & Andreas, Diekmann, 2021. "Parochial cooperation and the emergence of signalling norms," SocArXiv 9tg2f, Center for Open Science.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Peter T Leeson & Vincent Geloso & Nicholas A Snow, 2024. "Externality and taboo: Resolving the Judaic pig puzzle," Rationality and Society, , vol. 36(1), pages 5-33, February.
    6. Crawford, Sue E. S. & Ostrom, Elinor, 1995. "A Grammar of Institutions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(3), pages 582-600, September.
    7. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2004. "Social norms and human cooperation," Macroeconomics 0409026, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:9tg2f_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Frank, Robert H, 1992. "Melding Sociology and Economics: James Coleman's Foundations of Social Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 147-170, March.
    10. Karl-Dieter Opp, 2002. "When Do Norms Emerge by Human Design and When by the Unintended Consequences of Human Action?," Rationality and Society, , vol. 14(2), pages 131-158, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer A. Loughmiller-Cardinal & James Scott Cardinal, 2023. "The Behavior of Information: A Reconsideration of Social Norms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Mankat, Fabian, 2024. "Cooperation, norms, and gene-culture coevolution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 242-267.
    3. repec:rza:wpaper:227 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ethan Holdahl & Jiabin Wu, 2023. "Institutional Screening and the Sustainability of Conditional Cooperation," Papers 2311.02813, arXiv.org.
    5. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    6. Charness, Gary & Schram, Arthur, 2012. "Social and Moral Norms in the Laboratory," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt6rv7x0tf, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    7. Schmidt, Robert J., 2019. "Do injunctive or descriptive social norms elicited using coordination games better explain social preferences?," Working Papers 0668, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    8. Brooks, Jeremy S., 2010. "The Buddha mushroom: Conservation behavior and the development of institutions in Bhutan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 779-795, February.
    9. Heinicke, Franziska & König-Kersting, Christian & Schmidt, Robert, 2022. "Injunctive vs. descriptive social norms and reference group dependence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 199-218.
    10. Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney & Wallace E. Oates & Paul R. Portney, 2004. "The Political Economy of Environmental Policy," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 1, pages 3-30, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Larry Eubanks & Glenn L. Furton, 2024. "The institutional structure of pollution: large-scale externalities and the common law," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 429-450, December.
    12. Urs Steiner Brandt, 2008. "What can facilitate cooperation: Fairness, ineaulity aversion, punishment, norms or trust?," Working Papers 80/08, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    13. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    14. Tobias Heldt, 2005. "Informal sanctions and conditional cooperation: A natural experiment on voluntary contributions to a public good," Natural Field Experiments 00267, The Field Experiments Website.
    15. Cardenas, Juan-Camilo & Ostrom, Elinor, 2004. "What do people bring into the game? Experiments in the field about cooperation in the commons," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 307-326, December.
    16. Achim Schlüter & Insa Theesfeld, 2010. "The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(4), pages 445-475, November.
    17. Kitessa, R.J., 2018. "On the design and implementation of environmental conservation mechanisms : Evidence from field experiments," Other publications TiSEM cda8497d-6dcf-4092-b815-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Murray Petrie, 2002. "Institutions, Social Norms and Well-being," Treasury Working Paper Series 02/12, New Zealand Treasury.
    19. Freire, Danilo, 2017. "Prison Gangs," SocArXiv kuqqx, Center for Open Science.
    20. Gao, Bo & liu, Xuan & Hou, Shuxia & Jia, Danyang & Du, Mingjing, 2019. "Resolving public goods dilemma by giving the poor more support," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 362(C), pages 1-1.
    21. Sari, Nazmi, 2013. "On anti-smoking regulations and tobacco consumption," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 60-67.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:6-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.