IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v37y2025i4p451-473.html

Manifestation of labor discrimination in the academe through workload disparity based on marital status and sex

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Allen B. Yabut
  • Jefferson A. Arapoc

Abstract

This study examines how gender and marital status influence the distribution of workload among faculty members in a Philippine state university, where salaries are standardized. Although standardized pay structures eliminate traditional wage gaps, discrimination may persist through the unequal assignment of work tasks. Building on literature that highlights the gendered division of labor in academia, where women are disproportionately tasked with academic housework such as committee work, administrative duties, and community service, this study investigates disparities across different types of faculty work. Using propensity score matching and inverse probability weighted regression adjustment, the analysis finds no significant differences in total workload across gender and marital status. However, disparities in task allocation are evident. Female faculty members, particularly those who are married, are significantly more likely to shoulder additional committee work and extension responsibilities. These tasks, while essential to institutional operations, are often undervalued in tenure and promotion decisions, potentially hindering career advancement and contributing to job dissatisfaction. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of how structural inequalities persist in academic settings despite standardized compensation. This study contributes to the limited literature on workload inequality in Philippine higher education, underscoring the need for university policies that promote equitable task distribution to foster fairer and more inclusive career opportunities for all faculty members.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Allen B. Yabut & Jefferson A. Arapoc, 2025. "Manifestation of labor discrimination in the academe through workload disparity based on marital status and sex," Rationality and Society, , vol. 37(4), pages 451-473, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:451-473
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631251366165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631251366165
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631251366165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Hurst & Yona Rubinstein & Kazuatsu Shimizu, 2024. "Task-Based Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(6), pages 1723-1768, June.
    2. Laura K. Nelson & Alexandra Brewer & Anna S. Mueller & Daniel M. O’Connor & Arjun Dayal & Vineet M. Arora, 2023. "Taking the Time: The Implications of Workplace Assessment for Organizational Gender Inequality," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(4), pages 627-655, August.
    3. Linda Babcock & Maria P. Recalde & Lise Vesterlund & Laurie Weingart, 2017. "Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(3), pages 714-747, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Linos & Sanaz Mobasseri & Nina Roussille, 2025. "Intersectional Peer Effects at Work: The Effect of White Coworkers on Black Women’s Careers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7600-7630, September.
    2. Hao Peng & Misha Teplitskiy & Daniel M. Romero & Emőke-Ágnes Horvát, 2025. "The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Leanne Roncolato & Alex Roomets, 2020. "Who will change the “baby?” Examining the power of gender in an experimental setting," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 823-852, September.
    4. Kouki, Amairisa, 2023. "Beyond the “Comforts” of work from home: Child health and the female wage penalty," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Nicolás Ajzenman & Bruno Ferman & Pedro C. Sant'Anna, 2025. "Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks: A Field Experiment on #EconTwitter," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 357-375, September.
    6. Alan Kirman & François Laisney & Paul Pezanis-Christou, 2023. "Relaxing the symmetry assumption in participation games: a specification test for cluster-heterogeneity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(4), pages 850-878, September.
    7. Elaine Kelly & Isabel Stockton, 2024. "A senior doctor like me: Gender match and occupational choice," IFS Working Papers W24/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Sorana-Alexandra Constantinescu & Maria-Henriete Pozsar, 2022. "Was This Supposed to Be on the Test? Academic Leadership, Gender and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Denmark, Hungary, Romania, and United Kingdom," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Grossman, Philip J. & Eckel, Catherine & Komai, Mana & Zhan, Wei, 2019. "It pays to be a man: Rewards for leaders in a coordination game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 197-215.
    10. Florian Heine & Martin Sefton, 2018. "To Tender or Not to Tender? Deliberate and Exogenous Sunk Costs in a Public Good Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Verónica Amarante & Marisa Bucheli & Mar�a In�s Moraes & Tatiana P�rez, 2021. "Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 40(84), pages 763-790.
    12. Czibor, Eszter & Claussen, Jörg & van Praag, Mirjam, 2019. "Women in a men’s world: Risk taking in an online card game community," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 62-89.
    13. Cagatay Bircan & Guido Friebel & Tristan Stahl, 2025. "Gender Promotion Gaps in Knowledge Work: The Role of Task Assignment in Teams," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2518, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    14. Chen, Daniel & Hopfensitz, Astrid & van Leeuwen, Boris & van de Ven, Jeroen, 2019. "The Strategic Display of Emotions," Discussion Paper 2019-014, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Grissom, Jason A. & Timmer, Jennifer D. & Nelson, Jennifer L. & Blissett, Richard S.L., 2021. "Unequal pay for equal work? Unpacking the gender gap in principal compensation," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Hildegunn E. Stokke, 2021. "The gender wage gap and the early‐career effect: the role of actual experience and education level," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 35(2), pages 135-162, June.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:n473p_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2021. "Punishing defectors and rewarding cooperators: Do people discriminate between genders?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 19-32, September.
    19. Datta, Deepa D. & Tzur-Ilan, Nitzan, 2025. "Gender Gaps in the Federal Reserve System," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2023. "Committee Deliberation and Gender Differences in Influence," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_430, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    21. Karen Mumford & Cristina Sechel, 2020. "Pay and Job Rank among Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 82-113, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:451-473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.