IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v37y2025i2p230-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring voter turnout dynamics in polarized elections: A group-rule utilitarian framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam Arzumanyan

Abstract

Do differentiated policies encourage higher voter turnout than centrist policies? This paper uses the citizen-candidate model and group-based utilitarian approach of costly voting to study how political polarization affects voter turnout under positive voting costs. Two parties enter the electoral competition with a pre-commitment on the platforms, and the winner implements their ideal policy. Comparative statics results demonstrate that under positive voting costs, the expected turnout is always positive in the presence of political polarization and is only zero when the policies converge. In addition, the expected turnout rises with increased polarization and decreases with voting costs. This study exhaustively demonstrates that positive voter turnout is feasible only when policy differentiation exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam Arzumanyan, 2025. "Exploring voter turnout dynamics in polarized elections: A group-rule utilitarian framework," Rationality and Society, , vol. 37(2), pages 230-263, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:230-263
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631241300255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631241300255
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631241300255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:230-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.