IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v35y2023i2p167-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The King’s Gambit: Rationalizing the fall of the Templars

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel F. Benzecry
  • Marcus Shera

Abstract

What can the fall of the Knights Templars teach us about medieval institutions? We highlight that the Templar’s annihilation results from the institutional shock of Pope Clement V’s decision to relocate the papacy from Italy to France. Prior to the relocation, an equilibrium persisted for more than a century where the Templars made loans to more powerful kings, with the reassurance that they were protected by the Church. The decision of Pope Clement V to relocate the papacy to France altered the Church’s relationship with the French Crown and imposed substantial constraints on the Church’s ability to safeguard one of its most important monastic orders, the Knights Templar. In a dynamic game scenario, we model Clement V and Philip IV’s decision making, emphasizing important choices that led to the Knights Templar’s demise. This historical episode illustrates the relationship between credible commitments and religious legitimacy, and the precarious and personal nature of pre-modern political institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel F. Benzecry & Marcus Shera, 2023. "The King’s Gambit: Rationalizing the fall of the Templars," Rationality and Society, , vol. 35(2), pages 167-190, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:35:y:2023:i:2:p:167-190
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631231160657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631231160657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631231160657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:35:y:2023:i:2:p:167-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.