IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v35y2023i1p34-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic status, reputation, and interpersonal trust in peer-to-peer markets: Evidence from an online experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Marijn A Keijzer
  • Rense Corten

Abstract

Online peer-to-peer markets decentralize the distribution of resources, creating a trust problem in economic exchange on the internet. Individual characteristics of trustees — as determinants for being trusted — are therefore increasingly important. In light of this societal development, this study investigates the role of socioeconomic status and reputation as drivers of interpersonal trust. Some have argued that lower status trustees are trusted more easily because over the life course, they repeatedly rely on others' resources. Others state that higher status trustees are perceived as being more trustworthy, because they are more vulnerable to social control and loss of reputation. We propose a novel, experimental method for examining interpersonal trust situations that resembles the reality of peer-to-peer market platforms. 626 subjects in an online experiment were asked to place trust in their preferable trustee based on the asking price, and seller characteristics. The results from conditional logistic regression models showed that status increases perceived trustworthiness and positively affects the trust premium for past trustworthy behavior. Strong reputation effects were found, sending out a warning for inequitable emergent inequality of trust through reputation cascading.

Suggested Citation

  • Marijn A Keijzer & Rense Corten, 2023. "Socioeconomic status, reputation, and interpersonal trust in peer-to-peer markets: Evidence from an online experiment," Rationality and Society, , vol. 35(1), pages 34-60, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:34-60
    DOI: 10.1177/10434631221131771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10434631221131771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10434631221131771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:34-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.