IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v1y1973i1p59-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reconsideration of Some Aspects of the Utility Sacrifice Rules of Taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Donald F. Vitaliano

    (Department of Economics Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)

Abstract

This paper derives the type of tax system (progressive, proportional or regressive) required by different marginal income utility functions to satisfy the equal absolute and equal proportional sacrifice of utility among taxpayers. The context is that in which the rules were originally formulated, namely, the old welfare economics of measurable and comparable utility. It is found that equal absolute sacrifice calls for progression only if marginal income utility decreases at a faster rate than income increases (inelastic schedule). All other marginal utility curves require regressive taxation, save the unit elastic Bernoulli curves which requires proportional taxation. Equal proportional sacrifice indicates proportional taxation if the ratio of the area formed by the product of income and marginal utility to the total area under the marginal curve up to that income level is the same for all income levels. If this ratio decreases, progressive taxation is required; if it increases, regressive taxation is needed. With equal absolute sacrifice, the degree of progression is shown to be independent of the amount of utility sacrificed, whereas with equal proportional sacrifice the greater the proportion of utility to be sacrificed the more progressive (or less regressive) must be the tax structure. Finally, Musgrave's assertion that a unit elastic marginal income utility curve calls for proportional taxation under either rule is shown to be incorrect.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald F. Vitaliano, 1973. "A Reconsideration of Some Aspects of the Utility Sacrifice Rules of Taxation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 1(1), pages 59-65, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:1:y:1973:i:1:p:59-65
    DOI: 10.1177/109114217300100106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114217300100106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114217300100106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:1:y:1973:i:1:p:59-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.