IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v9y1997i1p133-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socialisation Antecedents of Allocation Rule Preferences in India

Author

Listed:
  • Lila Krishnan

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur)

Abstract

Distributive justice has been examined in the context of reward or resource allocation and the research findings indicate that there are individual and cultural variations in what people consider fair or just. Issues related to the determinants of individual and cultural difference in the perception of justice are discussed. Earlier studies are discussed which have shown that allocation rule preferences are determined by personal, situational and resource char acteristics that reflect cultural influences. However, socialisation as a deter minant has not been theoretically or empirically studied. The socialisation antecedents for justice rule preferences are discussed with reference to the at titudes and values of both traditional and contemporary Indian society and with reference to child rearing practices. Indian studies of allocation rule pref erences are presented which indicate that the effect of pervasive cultural norms are moderated by situational and resource characteristics. It has been pointed out that socialisation and child rearing practices are not highlighted in tra ditional texts. Five cultural dimensions, namely, collectivism, power distance, traditionalism, agricultural economy and scarcity are discussed and the link ages between cultural dimensions, socialisation and allocation rule preference are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Lila Krishnan, 1997. "Socialisation Antecedents of Allocation Rule Preferences in India," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 9(1), pages 133-148, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:9:y:1997:i:1:p:133-148
    DOI: 10.1177/097133369700900106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133369700900106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097133369700900106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:9:y:1997:i:1:p:133-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.