Author
Listed:
- Niyati Pandya
- Rachana Bhangaokar
Abstract
Recent decades have seen an increasing awareness of the need for emic explorations where psychological models and epistemologies originate from worldviews of indigenous worlds and inform mainstream psychology. The aim of the present study was to address this lacuna in moral psychology by examining the concept of suffering in the Hindu, Indian moral worldview. In a qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 urban adults ( M = 43.53 years) of Vadodara, India. The sample represented the high socio-economic class and was divided evenly between men and women. Participants responded to three major open-ended questions about ideas of suffering and related probes: (a) All people suffer at some point in life. Why do you think there is suffering? (b) Does suffering serve any purpose? Does it have any meaning? and (c) Can suffering be eliminated? In-person interviews were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and used for thematic analysis. Select verbatim responses representing various themes were used to explain how adults spoke about suffering. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (a) forms of suffering, (b) the karmic nature of suffering, and (c) alleviating suffering through self-refinement. Findings contrast notably with the corpus of current literature on suffering, dominated by WEIRD cultures and often restricted to biomedical conditions. Importantly, the study highlights the centrality of one’s swadharma , interpreting moral actions in a karmic framework and cultivating equanimity ( samatvam ) through self-refinement as a means of alleviating suffering. The study contributes to the conceptualisation of psychological well-being in contemporary times from the Hindu, Indian perspective.
Suggested Citation
Niyati Pandya & Rachana Bhangaokar, 2025.
"Suffering and Self-refinement: Moral Perspectives from a Hindu, Indian Worldview,"
Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 37(1), pages 93-117, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:psydev:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:93-117
DOI: 10.1177/09713336251372670
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:37:y:2025:i:1:p:93-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.