IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v13y2001i2p221-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situational Preference for Different Types of Individualism-Collectivism

Author

Listed:
  • Jyoti Verma

    (Patna University, Patna)

Abstract

One hundred and fifty postgraduate students of Patna University responded to 16 scen arios followed by four alternatives, indicating dominant preference for different typres of individualism-collectivism that is, Horizontal Collectivism, Horizontal Individualism, Vertical Collectivism, or Horizontal Individualism. The observations were compared with the findings of an earlier cross-cultural study by Verma and Triandis (1999), who used the scenarios for measuring the dominant cultural dimensions of American and Indian students. In the present study, minor changes were made for making the situ ations appear more familiar to the Indian respondents. The results proved that the four types of individualism-collectivism were significantly different but there was no significant difference in the percentage of respondents who preferred to choose these in the two studies. Furthermore, the most and the least preferred types were Vertical Collectivism and Vertical Individualism respectively. It appeared that the students pre ferred to be collectivist in social interactions, in matters concerning the pleasure of friends and seniors and in maintaining family ties. However, in situations with direct reference to their personal and individual causes, they preferred to take an individualist stand. Taken in totality, the scenarios appeared to be a reliable instrument for measur ing the preference for dominant cultural dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyoti Verma, 2001. "Situational Preference for Different Types of Individualism-Collectivism," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 13(2), pages 221-241, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:13:y:2001:i:2:p:221-241
    DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133360101300206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097133360101300206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:13:y:2001:i:2:p:221-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.