IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v13y2001i2p153-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indigenous Social Psychology of Science for a Developing Society: An Empirical Justification

Author

Listed:
  • Neelam Kumar

    (National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi)

Abstract

The study begins with the question of whether there should be an indigenous social psychology of science for the developing world. In search of an answer, this study par ticularly explores whether the scientific values of Indian scientists are context bound or universal in nature. Using a psychometric approach, this study explores the nature of scientific values held by Indian scientists. To explore the structure of scientists' values, factor analysis was used. Results reveal replication of a few dimensions conceptualised in previous research in other cultural contexts and point towards the universal nature of research-related values. The results also show the similarities in terms of the nature in which scientific values relate to various research behaviours of scientists. The study further reveals that research-related values of scientists did not vary either with the biographical or the work context (that is, academic and national laboratory). Actually these varied with the various research activities. This provides additional validity of the universal nature of scientists' value system. Thus as far as the epistemological aspects of science are concerned, the need for a separate psychology related to science in develop ing countries does not seem desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Neelam Kumar, 2001. "Indigenous Social Psychology of Science for a Developing Society: An Empirical Justification," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 13(2), pages 153-171, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:13:y:2001:i:2:p:153-171
    DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097133360101300203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097133360101300203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:13:y:2001:i:2:p:153-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.