IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v18y2018i2p110-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flagships and tumbleweed: A history of the politics of gender justice work in Oxfam GB 1986–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Crewe

    (Department of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS, University of London)

Abstract

This article contributes to scholarship on the political nature of feminists’ work in international development NGOs. The case study of Oxfam GB (OGB) is contemporary history, based on compiling a brief history of gender justice work between 1986 and 2014 and 18 months of part-time participant-observation fieldwork during 2014–15. I describe funding pressures and imperatives, contestations of meaning and power struggles within OGB and argue that gender justice becomes entangled in both internal and the external politics of international development. This is part of a wider research programme about how ideas on gender equality norms travel between and around development organizations, so I finally draw conclusions about how norms are contested and embodied. The shapeshifting political nature of feminist work challenges prevailing theories about how norms and ideas travel and take hold within organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Crewe, 2018. "Flagships and tumbleweed: A history of the politics of gender justice work in Oxfam GB 1986–2015," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 18(2), pages 110-125, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:18:y:2018:i:2:p:110-125
    DOI: 10.1177/1464993417750286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993417750286
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1464993417750286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:18:y:2018:i:2:p:110-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.