Emotions, norms, and the genealogy of fairness
In The Grammar of Society , Bicchieri maintains that behavior in the Ultimatum game (and related economic games) depends on peopleâ€™s allegiance to â€˜social normsâ€™. In this article, I follow Bicchieri in maintaining that an adequate account of peopleâ€™s behavior in such games must make appeal to norms, including a norm of equal division; I depart from Bicchieri in maintaining that at least part of the population desires to follow such norms even when they do not expect others to follow them. This generates a puzzle, however: why do norms of equal division have such cultural resilience? One possibility is that our natural emotional propensity for envy makes norms of equal division emotionally appealing. An alternative (but complementary) possibility is that deviations from a norm of equal division would naturally be interpreted as threats to status, which would facilitate the moralization of such norms.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:9:y:2010:i:3:p:275-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publishing)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.