Brown on Millâ€™s moral theory: A critical response
In this article, I argue that the reading of Mill that D.G. Brown presents in â€˜Millâ€™s Moral Theory: Ongoing Revisionismâ€™ is inconsistent with several key passages in Millâ€™s writings. I also show that a rule-utilitarian interpretation that is very close to the one developed by David Lyons is able to account for these passages without difficulty.
Volume (Year): 9 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:9:y:2010:i:1:p:47-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.