IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v8y2009i4p401-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neo-republicanism, freedom as non-domination, and citizen virtue

Author

Listed:
  • M. Victoria Costa

    (Florida State University, USA, vcosta@admin.fsu.edu)

Abstract

This article discusses Philip Pettit’s neo-republicanism in light of the criterion of self-sustenance: the requirement that a political theory be capable of serving as a self-sustaining public philosophy for a pluralist democracy. It argues that this criterion can only be satisfied by developing an adequate politics of virtue. Pettit’s theory is built around the notion of freedom as non-domination, and he does not say much about the virtues of citizens or the policies the state may employ to encourage their development. In order to explain the motivation to comply with republican laws that promote non-domination, Pettit relies on the phenomenon of civility and the mechanism of the intangible hand. But to understand what underlies an adequate level of robust civility one needs to focus on the more basic phenomenon of personal virtue. Policies that aim to promote non-domination should take into account the need to cultivate virtue among citizens, as well as the full range of conditions that favor its exercise.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Victoria Costa, 2009. "Neo-republicanism, freedom as non-domination, and citizen virtue," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 8(4), pages 401-419, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:4:p:401-419
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X09343079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X09343079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X09343079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:4:p:401-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.