IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v8y2009i4p374-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Each outcome is another opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Clare Chambers

    (University of Cambridge, UK, cec66@cam.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of a Moment of Equal Opportunity (MEO): a point in an individual’s life at which equal opportunity must be applied and after which it need not. The concept of equal opportunity takes many forms, and not all employ an MEO. However, the more egalitarian a theory of equal opportunity is, the more likely it is to use an MEO. The article discusses various theories of equal opportunity and argues that those that employ an MEO are problematic. Unjust inequalities, those that motivate the use of equal opportunity, occur throughout people’s lives and thus go unrectified after an MEO. However, it is not possible to abandon the MEO approach and apply more egalitarian versions of equal opportunity throughout a person’s life, since doing so entails problems of epistemology, efficiency, incentives, and counter-intuitive results. The article thus argues that liberal egalitarian theories of equality of opportunity are inconsistent if they support an MEO and unrealizable if they do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Clare Chambers, 2009. "Each outcome is another opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 8(4), pages 374-400, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:4:p:374-400
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X09343066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X09343066
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X09343066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:4:p:374-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.