IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v8y2009i2p223-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Becker's thesis and three models of preference change

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Bradley

    (London School of Economics, UK, rbradley@lse.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article examines Becker's thesis that the hypothesis that choices maximize expected utility relative to fixed and universal tastes provides a general framework for the explanation of behaviour. Three different models of preference revision are presented and their scope evaluated. The first, the classical conditioning model, explains all changes in preferences in terms of changes in the information held by the agent, holding fundamental beliefs and desires fixed. The second, the Jeffrey conditioning model, explains them in terms of changes in both the information held by the agent and changes in her prior beliefs, holding her fundamental desires fixed. The final model, that of generalized conditioning, allows for explanations in terms of changes in the values of all three variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Bradley, 2009. "Becker's thesis and three models of preference change," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 8(2), pages 223-242, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:2:p:223-242
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X09102238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X09102238
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X09102238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:8:y:2009:i:2:p:223-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.