IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v4y2005i2p195-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Perhaps the most important primary good’: self-respect and Rawls’s principles of justice

Author

Listed:
  • Nir Eyal

    (Princeton University, USA, neyal@princeton.edu)

Abstract

The article begins by reconstructing the just distribution of the social bases of self-respect, a principle of justice that is covert in Rawls’s writing. I argue that, for Rawls, justice mandates that each social basis for self-respect be equalized (and, as a second priority, maximized). Curiously, for Rawls, that principle ranks higher than Rawls’s two more famous principles of justice - equal liberty and the difference principle. I then recall Rawls’s well-known confusion between self-respect and another form of self-appraisal, namely, confidence in one’s determinate plans and capacities. Correcting that confusion forces Rawls to accept objectionable and illiberal politics. Surprisingly, a consistent Rawls must endorse absolute economic equality, deny liberty any priority whatsoever, or sponsor still other illiberal political views - evidence of a flaw in the ethical basis of Rawls’s politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nir Eyal, 2005. "‘Perhaps the most important primary good’: self-respect and Rawls’s principles of justice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 4(2), pages 195-219, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:4:y:2005:i:2:p:195-219
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X05052538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X05052538
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X05052538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:4:y:2005:i:2:p:195-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.