IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v2y2003i1p37-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Obligation and Military Service in Three Countries

Author

Listed:
  • George Klosko

    (University of Virginia, USA gk@virginia.edu)

  • Michael Keren

    (University of Calgary, Canada and Tel Aviv University, Israel mkeren@ucalgary.ca)

  • Stacy Nyikos

    (University of Tulsa, USA stacy-nyikos@utulsa.edu)

Abstract

Although questions of political obligation have been much discussed by scholars, little attention has been paid to moral reasons advanced by actual states to justify the compliance of their subjects. We examine the `self-image of the state' through Supreme Court decisions in the USA, Germany, and Israel. Because moral reasons are expressed especially clearly in cases regarding obligations to provide military service, we focus on these. In spite of their important constitutional and judicial differences, the three states support military obligations along similar lines, though with some differences. In all three countries, appeal is made to obligations of reciprocity. Individuals must serve in order to provide the important benefit of defense. This `service conception' of political obligation accords norms of fairness or equality a central role, in order to justify the service of particular individuals. Reasons for less emphasis on fairness in Israeli cases are examined, while we claim that the overall similarities of the three countries provide some measure of indirect support to a theory of political obligation based on the principle of fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • George Klosko & Michael Keren & Stacy Nyikos, 2003. "Political Obligation and Military Service in Three Countries," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 2(1), pages 37-62, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:2:y:2003:i:1:p:37-62
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X03002001423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X03002001423
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X03002001423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:2:y:2003:i:1:p:37-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.