IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v20y2021i4p339-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsibility for structural injustice: A third thought

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E Goodin

    (Australian National University, Australia)

  • Christian Barry

    (Australian National University, Australia)

Abstract

Some of the most invidious injustices are seemingly the results of impersonal workings of rigged social structures. Who bears responsibility for the injustices perpetrated through them? Iris Marion Young – the pre-eminent theorist of responsibility for structural injustice – argues that we should be responsible mostly in forward-looking ways for remedying structural injustice, rather than liable in a backward-looking way for creating it. In so doing she distinguishes between individualized responsibility for past structural injustice and collective responsibility for preventing future structural injustice. We reject both those arguments but embrace and extend Young’s third line of analysis, which was much less fully developed in her work. We agree that people should take a stand against structural injustice, even if it is likely to prove futile. That is in fact a position that is widely endorsed in social practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E Goodin & Christian Barry, 2021. "Responsibility for structural injustice: A third thought," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 20(4), pages 339-356, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:20:y:2021:i:4:p:339-356
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X211027257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X211027257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X211027257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:20:y:2021:i:4:p:339-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.