IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v1y2002i1p109-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Persisting Opposition

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Goodin

    (Australian National University, Australia goodinb@cooombs.anu.edu.au)

Abstract

If voters accord evidentiary value to one another's reports, revising their own views in the light of them as Bayesian rationality requires, then even relatively small electoral majorities ought to prove rationally compelling and opposition ought rationally to vanish. For democratic theory, that is a jarring result. While there are no resources for avoiding that result within the Bayesian model itself, there are various aspects of the political process lying outside that model which do serve to underwrite the rationality of persistent opposition to majority opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Goodin, 2002. "The Paradox of Persisting Opposition," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 1(1), pages 109-146, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:1:y:2002:i:1:p:109-146
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X02001001005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X02001001005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X02001001005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:1:y:2002:i:1:p:109-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.