IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v18y2019i1p3-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement and desert

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Douglas

    (University of Oxford, UK)

Abstract

It is sometimes claimed that those who succeed with the aid of enhancement technologies deserve the rewards associated with their success less, other things being equal, than those who succeed without the aid of such technologies. This claim captures some widely held intuitions, has been implicitly endorsed by participants in social–psychological research and helps to undergird some otherwise puzzling philosophical objections to the use of enhancement technologies. I consider whether it can be provided with a rational basis. I examine three arguments that might be offered in its favour and argue that each either shows only that enhancements undermine desert in special circumstances or succeeds only under assumptions that deprive the appeal to desert of much of its dialectic interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Douglas, 2019. "Enhancement and desert," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(1), pages 3-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:3-22
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X18810439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X18810439
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X18810439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:3-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.