IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v54y2026i3p323-348.html

Digitizing Labor Unrest: Heterogeneous Effects of Digital Communication on Strike Frequency in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Guelerman

Abstract

How does access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) impact labor unrest? In Brazil, strike activity has increased since around 2013, coinciding with the rapid diffusion of smartphones and mobile internet. To explain this shift, I combine qualitative interviews with subcontracted service workers and quantitative analysis of private sector strikes (SAG-DIEESE dataset). Interviews show that ICTs facilitated strike coordination for workers dispersed across small, spatially isolated workplaces. Statistical patterns are consistent with this mechanism: Since the period of ICT diffusion, strike growth has been steeper in industries with highly dispersed workforces; moreover, higher internet access within industry categories is associated with more strikes, especially in categories with higher dispersion. However, strike increases were sharper for lower-risk strikes over employment violations than for higher-risk strikes demanding better contracts. The findings suggest that ICTs expanded workers’ capacity to coordinate labor protest, especially in spatially fragmented industries, but riskier action still depends more on traditional labor organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Guelerman, 2026. "Digitizing Labor Unrest: Heterogeneous Effects of Digital Communication on Strike Frequency in Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 54(3), pages 323-348, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:54:y:2026:i:3:p:323-348
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292261452876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292261452876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292261452876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:54:y:2026:i:3:p:323-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.