IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v53y2025i4p630-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politicizing Inequality in Times of Sociocultural Conflict: How New Left and Far Right Voters Think About Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Silja Häusermann

    (University of Zurich)

  • Tabea Palmtag

    (University of Zurich)

  • Delia Zollinger

    (University of Zurich)

  • Tarik Abou-Chadi

    (Nuffield College, University of Oxford)

  • Stefanie Walter

    (University of Zurich)

  • Sarah Berkinshaw

    (University of Zurich)

Abstract

The antagonism between far right and new left parties has transformed West European politics through increasing sociocultural conflict. We ask what this new cleavage implies for the politicization of inequalities. We contrast two diverging theoretical expectations. The first expects a tradeoff between sociocultural and socioeconomic inequalities, with new left voters emphasizing the former over the latter, and vice versa for far right voters. The second predicts a single dimension of inequality attitudes, from new left “universalists†being inequality averse to far right “particularists†being more inequality tolerant. Evidence based on survey data from Germany supports the second perspective. Even new left voters in the educated middle classes are more averse to all dimensions of inequality than (far) right voters. This implies that a successful new left agenda can simultaneously target various inequalities. However, in contexts of polarized party competition, divisive sociocultural conflicts may crowd out attention to traditional, less divisive socioeconomic inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Silja Häusermann & Tabea Palmtag & Delia Zollinger & Tarik Abou-Chadi & Stefanie Walter & Sarah Berkinshaw, 2025. "Politicizing Inequality in Times of Sociocultural Conflict: How New Left and Far Right Voters Think About Inequality," Politics & Society, , vol. 53(4), pages 630-655, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:4:p:630-655
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292251353374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292251353374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292251353374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:4:p:630-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.