IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v53y2025i2p274-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth Coalitions Within a Corporatist Setting: How Manufacturing Interests Dominated the German Response to the Energy Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Donato Di Carlo

    (London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK)

  • Anke Hassel

    (Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany)

  • Martin Höpner

    (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

Since the introduction of the euro, German growth has been primarily based on exports. Signs of an exhaustion of Germany's export-led growth model were already evident before the energy crisis of 2022–23, which hit the country hard. German elites could have capitalized on the shock to rebalance their growth strategy. But the opposite happened: the government's adjustment strategy has aimed at doubling down on export-led growth and protecting the core export industries. This article investigates the politics of Germany's economic policymaking in hard times. We show that the government's economic policy responses were driven largely by an export sector growth coalition led by cross-class alliances in the chemical, metalworking, and engineering sectors. In contrast to previous corporatist decision-making, which aimed to include broader societal concerns in peak-level concertation, German corporatism has undergone a functional transformation toward the predominance of export sector distributive coalitions. This article's findings contribute to the emerging literature on the politics of growth models in comparative political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Donato Di Carlo & Anke Hassel & Martin Höpner, 2025. "Growth Coalitions Within a Corporatist Setting: How Manufacturing Interests Dominated the German Response to the Energy Crisis," Politics & Society, , vol. 53(2), pages 274-310, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:2:p:274-310
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292241292920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292241292920
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292241292920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:53:y:2025:i:2:p:274-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.