IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v50y2022i2p279-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a Political Sociology of Dispossession: Explaining Opposition to Capital Projects in India

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Levien
  • Smriti Upadhyay

Abstract

Land dispossession is a major source of protest in many countries. This article asks, How common are cases of mobilization against land dispossession relative to cases of nonmobilization? Why do we see protests against land dispossession for some projects and not others? These questions are taken up in the context of India, a major global hotspot for land dispossession protest. Using a database of all major capital projects in the country, the article looks at the effects of project characteristics and context on incidence of delays or cancellations due to land acquisition problems. The findings demonstrate that a project’s sector and subnational location affect the emergence of opposition to land dispossession. Further, differences in political competitiveness and agrarian social structure are significant factors driving subnational variation. By identifying important factors shaping opposition to land dispossession, the article aims to stimulate comparative research that can advance a political sociology of dispossession.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Levien & Smriti Upadhyay, 2022. "Toward a Political Sociology of Dispossession: Explaining Opposition to Capital Projects in India," Politics & Society, , vol. 50(2), pages 279-310, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:279-310
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292211016587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292211016587
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292211016587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:279-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.