IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v50y2022i2p191-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delegated Censorship: The Dynamic, Layered, and Multistage Information Control Regime in China

Author

Listed:
  • Taiyi Sun

    (Christopher Newport University)

  • Quansheng Zhao

    (American University)

Abstract

How does internet censorship work in China, and how does it reflect the Chinese state’s logic of governing society? An online political publication, Global China (海外看世界), was created by the authors, and the pattern and record of articles being censored was analyzed. Using results from A/B tests on the articles and interviews with relevant officials, the article shows that the state employs delegated censorship , outsourcing significant responsibility to private internet companies and applying levels of scrutiny based on timing, targets, and stage of publication. The dynamic, layered, multistage censorship regime creates significant variation and flexibility across the Chinese internet, most often in decisions about what to censor. This approach aims to maintain regime stability and legitimacy while minimizing costs. Rather than blocking all information and players, the state recognizes its technical and bureaucratic limits but also realizes the benefits of a degree of toleration. Delegated censorship utilizes both power control and power sharing and offers a new understanding of authoritarian state-society relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Taiyi Sun & Quansheng Zhao, 2022. "Delegated Censorship: The Dynamic, Layered, and Multistage Information Control Regime in China," Politics & Society, , vol. 50(2), pages 191-221, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:191-221
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292211013181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292211013181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292211013181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:50:y:2022:i:2:p:191-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.