IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v49y2021i2p181-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Pay Parity in the Public Sector: The Overlooked Role of Employee Mobilization

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel M. Perera

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Desmond King

    (University of Oxford, Nuffield College)

Abstract

Rising economic inequality has aggravated long-standing labor market disparities, with one exception: government employment. This article considers the puzzle of black-white wage parity in the American public sector. African Americans are more likely to work in the public than in the private sector, and their wages are higher there. The article builds on prior work emphasizing institutional factors conditioning this outcome to argue that employee mobilization can motor it. As public sector unions gained political influence postwar, their large constituencies of black, blue-collar workers, drawing on both militant and nonviolent tactics of the urbanizing civil rights movement, advocated for improved working conditions. Archival sources confirm this pattern at the federal level. The employment and activism of African Americans in low-skilled federal jobs pivoted union attention to blue-collar issues and directly contributed to the enactment of a transparent, universal wage schedule for the blue-collar federal workforce (the Federal Wage System). The result was greater pay parity for African Americans, as well as for other disadvantaged groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel M. Perera & Desmond King, 2021. "Racial Pay Parity in the Public Sector: The Overlooked Role of Employee Mobilization," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(2), pages 181-202, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:181-202
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220921591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220921591
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220921591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:49:y:2021:i:2:p:181-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.