IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v48y2020i2p199-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loyalists, Localists, and Legibility: The Calibrated Control of Provincial Leadership Teams in China

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Bulman

    (Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies)

  • Kyle A. Jaros

    (School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford)

Abstract

Selecting provincial leaders is a fraught task for authoritarian regimes. Although central authorities more readily trust provincial leaders with close ties to the center, such loyalists may lack the local knowledge and connections necessary to govern adeptly. Using an original data set on the tenures and backgrounds of China’s provincial party standing committee members, this article explores how Beijing fine-tunes provincial leadership teams to resolve this dilemma. The analysis challenges the conventional wisdom that Beijing exerts its tightest personnel control in strategically important provinces. It shows that Beijing tolerates significant embeddedness of local leadership in provinces with complex governance challenges even when these provinces are important. Moreover, it finds that when the center reasserts control through appointments of loyalist personnel during times of crisis, it does so in a balanced manner. These calibrated personnel strategies highlight the extent to which authoritarian systems rely on local expertise and experience as well as top-down control.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Bulman & Kyle A. Jaros, 2020. "Loyalists, Localists, and Legibility: The Calibrated Control of Provincial Leadership Teams in China," Politics & Society, , vol. 48(2), pages 199-234, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:2:p:199-234
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329220908691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329220908691
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329220908691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:48:y:2020:i:2:p:199-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.