IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v47y2019i1p3-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing the Gold Window: The End of Bretton Woods as a Contingency Plan

Author

Listed:
  • Christoffer J. P. Zoeller

Abstract

In August of 1971, President Nixon announced that the United States was “closing the gold window,†bringing an end to the postwar system of international exchange rate stability and precipitating a period of significant uncertainty and transformation in global institutions. Although this critical historical episode is important for an understanding of historical “neoliberalism†and institutional change, modern sociological perspectives have scarcely been applied to it. The present analysis uses archival data to show that closing the gold window was never the goal or preferred strategy of the Nixon administration, which had spent years preparing much more modest reforms. Nevertheless, US policymakers took this unilateral action as a contingency plan to achieve a short-term goal, knowing that it would dramatically change the functioning of the international economy. Surprisingly, the autonomous structure of the IMF did not channel US initiatives toward gradual evolution but rather helped determine a radical change in strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoffer J. P. Zoeller, 2019. "Closing the Gold Window: The End of Bretton Woods as a Contingency Plan," Politics & Society, , vol. 47(1), pages 3-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:1:p:3-22
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218823648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218823648
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218823648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:47:y:2019:i:1:p:3-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.