IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v46y2018i1p53-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Hidden Policy: Feedback Effects and the Charitable Contributions Deduction

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly L. Russell

Abstract

Policy feedback, or the process in which policies create constituencies vested in their maintenance, is a durable feature of the American welfare state. Scholars have shown that policy visibility conditions how feedback effects unfold: for public-private policies—arrangements in which the state delegates service provision to private actors, often described as “hidden†or “submerged†—policy feedback typically galvanizes not citizens but market actors that benefit indirectly from these subsidies. This article extends theories of public-private policy feedback from market actors to charitable organizations through a case study of the charitable contributions deduction. The deduction’s incremental expansion is found to have mobilized charities as powerful stakeholders in the policy’s endurance. Charities’ efforts to protect the deduction, together with the efforts of lawmakers, have couched the policy in a politics of neoliberalism and disguised its effects, insulating it from reform even as elites have netted a greater share of its benefits over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly L. Russell, 2018. "The Politics of Hidden Policy: Feedback Effects and the Charitable Contributions Deduction," Politics & Society, , vol. 46(1), pages 53-80, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:1:p:53-80
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218754504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218754504
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218754504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:1:p:53-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.