IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v46y2018i1p29-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging Art and Bureaucracy: Marginalization, State-Society Relations, and Cultural Policy in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Gillman

Abstract

Even under many formally democratic regimes, large swaths of the citizenry experience alienation from states with uneven presence throughout the national territory. Addressing a gap in scholarship that has examined why rather than how states establish new modes of engagement with subaltern groups, this article documents concrete mechanisms by which the Brazilian state built new state-society relations through a particular cultural policy. By recognizing and funding artistic initiatives in underserved communities, the program aimed to expand their access to the state and validate their role in the polity. On the basis of in-depth fieldwork in three Brazilian states, the article argues that new relations actually were forged through state-society encounters around the program’s administrative procedures. The surprising twist—that paperwork, as much as art, played a transformative role—sheds new light on bureaucracy as a point of contact with the state and offers new insights into the ways that cultural politics can shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Gillman, 2018. "Bridging Art and Bureaucracy: Marginalization, State-Society Relations, and Cultural Policy in Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 46(1), pages 29-51, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:1:p:29-51
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329218754503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218754503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329218754503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:1:p:29-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.