IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v45y2017i4p505-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State’s Role in Globalization: Korea’s Experience from a Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kyung Mi Kim

    (Korean Institute of Political Studies, Seoul National University)

  • Hyeong-Ki Kwon

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

By analyzing how Korea has upgraded its industrial capabilities in the course of corporate globalization, this article holds that some versions of developmental state work better in the globalization process. Globalizing national corporations, neoliberal optimism notwithstanding, does not necessarily result in upgrading domestic innovation capabilities. In the United States, free-market firms may benefit through offshoring, but they create holes in the industrial linkages or industrial commons at home, enfeebling US capability for innovation. By contrast, the Korean government successfully upgraded domestic firms’ innovation capabilities and reduced the possibility of deindustrialization in the course of globalization by moving from classical developmentalism to a new form of development based on inclusive and collaborative networks. Korea’s earlier classical developmentalism focused on mobilization of physical capital, funneling it exclusively to a few firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyung Mi Kim & Hyeong-Ki Kwon, 2017. "The State’s Role in Globalization: Korea’s Experience from a Comparative Perspective," Politics & Society, , vol. 45(4), pages 505-531, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:45:y:2017:i:4:p:505-531
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329217715614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329217715614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329217715614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:45:y:2017:i:4:p:505-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.