IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v44y2016i2p281-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walking the Line

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Prasad

    (Northwestern University)

  • Steve G. Hoffman

    (University of Toronto)

  • Kieran Bezila

    (Beloit College)

Abstract

Over one-third of the white working class in America vote for Republicans. Some scholars argue that these voters support Republican economic policies, while others argue that these voters’ preferences on cultural and moral issues override their economic preferences. We draw on in-depth interviews with 120 white working-class voters to defend a broadly “economic†interpretation: for this segment of voters, moral and cultural appeals have an economic dimension, because these voters believe certain moral behaviors will help them prosper economically. Even the very word “conservative†is understood as referencing not respect for tradition generally, but avoidance of debt and excessive consumption specifically. For many respondents, the need to focus on morality and personal responsibility as a means of prospering economically—what we call “walking the line†—accords with the rhetoric they associate with Republicans. Deindustrialization may have heightened the appeal of this rhetoric.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Prasad & Steve G. Hoffman & Kieran Bezila, 2016. "Walking the Line," Politics & Society, , vol. 44(2), pages 281-304, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:44:y:2016:i:2:p:281-304
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329216638062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329216638062
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329216638062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:44:y:2016:i:2:p:281-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.