IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v42y2014i1p51-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Ahlberg

    (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)

  • Harry Brighouse

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA)

Abstract

This paper identifies four criteria, all of which an ideal real utopian proposal would meet. We argue for a moderate skepticism that it is possible to give a real utopian proposal to guide the design of education for a society that meets these criteria; both for the practical reason that what happens in schools depends on the background environment within which they operate, and for the principled reason that when educating children we should attend to their individual future well-being in ways that militate against taking the risk that we are preparing them for an environment that they will not, in fact, inhabit. In place of a real utopian proposal, then, we embark on the easier task of defending a moderate set of feasible reforms that, implemented in the context of an unreformed US economy, would make the school system realize, somewhat better than it does, the principles that should guide the design of school systems in ideal and nonideal contexts. These include reducing the size of schools, lengthening the amount of time that children spend in school, and constructing cross-school standards that can guide professional development of teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Ahlberg & Harry Brighouse, 2014. "Education," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(1), pages 51-72, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:42:y:2014:i:1:p:51-72
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329213512979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329213512979
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329213512979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:42:y:2014:i:1:p:51-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.