IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v40y2012i2p273-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing “Disinterested†Academic Science

Author

Listed:
  • Dina Biscotti
  • William B. Lacy
  • Leland L. Glenna
  • Rick Welsh

Abstract

This article analyzes how exchange participants in university–industry agricultural biotechnology research collaborations manage and create differences between the academy and industry with regard to the open dissemination and commercialization of scientific knowledge. Our focus is on the constitutive relations that define the boundary between academic and commercial science. We identify a particular “relational package†that formalizes and standardizes exchanges of money from industry for privileged access to university research discoveries. Our analysis of academic scientists’ justificatory narratives about their patenting decisions challenges the oft-made assertion that academic patenting on its face should be taken as evidence of a blurred institutional boundary between academic and commercial science.

Suggested Citation

  • Dina Biscotti & William B. Lacy & Leland L. Glenna & Rick Welsh, 2012. "Constructing “Disinterested†Academic Science," Politics & Society, , vol. 40(2), pages 273-308, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:40:y:2012:i:2:p:273-308
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329212441601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329212441601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329212441601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:40:y:2012:i:2:p:273-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.