IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v38y2010i4p517-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politicization of Religion: Political Catholicism and Political Islam in Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • AteÅŸ Altınordu

    (Sabancı University, Istanbul, Turkey, atesaltinordu@sabanciuniv.edu)

Abstract

While religious politics have been a widely discussed topic in the social sciences in recent decades, few studies develop general explanations based on systematic and detailed comparative analysis. This article seeks to explain when and how successful religious parties rise. To that end, I comparatively analyze the politicization of German Catholicism in the second half of the nineteenth century (1848—1878) and Turkish Islam in the post-1970 period (1970—2002) and briefly examine the negative case of nineteenth-century German Protestantism. According to the theory of revival-reaction-politicization I propose, successful religious parties rise when major religious revivals confront social counter-mobilization and state repression, provided that existing political parties do not effectively represent religious defense. The study's findings challenge the pervasive tendency to treat Christian and Islamic politics as incommensurable.

Suggested Citation

  • AteÅŸ Altınordu, 2010. "The Politicization of Religion: Political Catholicism and Political Islam in Comparative Perspective," Politics & Society, , vol. 38(4), pages 517-551, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:4:p:517-551
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329210381238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210381238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329210381238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:4:p:517-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.