IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v37y2009i2p167-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Slants on the Slippery Slope: The Politics of Polygamy and Gay Family Rights in South Africa and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Stacey

    (Social and Cultural Analysis and Professor of Sociology at New York University, judith.stacey@nyu.edu)

  • Tey Meadow

    (Department of Sociology at New York University, tey.meadow@nyu.edu)

Abstract

This article investigates the often cited and dismissed, but rarely examined, relationship between legalizing same-sex marriage and polygamy. Employing a comparative historical analysis of U.S. and South African jurisprudence, ideology, and cultural politics, we examine efforts to expand, restrict, and regulate the gender and number of legally recognized conjugal bonds. South African family jurisprudence grants legal recognition to both same-sex marriage and polygyny, while the United States prohibits and resists both. However, social and material conditions make it easier to practice family diversity in the U.S. than in South Africa. Our analysis of the very different histories of polygamy and same-sex marriage in the two societies suggests the centrality of racial politics to marriage regimes, yielding paradoxical narratives about the implications of legal same-sex marriage for the future of polygamy and sexual democracy. If there is a slippery marital slope, we argue, it does not tilt in a singular or expected direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Stacey & Tey Meadow, 2009. "New Slants on the Slippery Slope: The Politics of Polygamy and Gay Family Rights in South Africa and the United States," Politics & Society, , vol. 37(2), pages 167-202, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:37:y:2009:i:2:p:167-202
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329209333924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329209333924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329209333924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family; homosexuality; law; marriage; race;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:37:y:2009:i:2:p:167-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.