IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v35y2007i3p403-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Class Is Not Dead—It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990)

Author

Listed:
  • Jeroen van der Waal

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands, vanderwaal@fsw.eur.nl)

  • Peter Achterberg

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands, (p.achterberg@fsw.eur.nl)

  • Dick Houtman

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands, houtman@fsw.eur.nl)

Abstract

By means of a reanalysis of the most relevant data source—the International Social Mobility and Politics File—this article criticizes the newly grown consensus in political sociology that class voting has declined since World War II. An increase in crosscutting cultural voting, rooted in educational differences rather than a decline in class voting, proves responsible for the decline of traditional class-party alignments. Moreover, income differences have not become less but more consequential for voting behavior during this period. It is concluded that the new consensus has been built on quicksand. Class is not dead—it has been buried alive under the increasing weight of cultural voting, systematically misinterpreted as a decline in class voting because of the widespread application of the so-called Alford index.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeroen van der Waal & Peter Achterberg & Dick Houtman, 2007. "Class Is Not Dead—It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990)," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(3), pages 403-426, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:35:y:2007:i:3:p:403-426
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329207304314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329207304314
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329207304314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:35:y:2007:i:3:p:403-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.