IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v33y2005i4p567-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employers and the Politics of Skill Formation in a Coordinated Market Economy: Collective Action and Class Conflict in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Bowman

    (Queens College and the CUNY Graduate Center)

Abstract

This article uses a case study of vocational training in Norway to explore the conditions under which employers will cooperate to increase the skill level of their workforce. It generates two sets of insights into the political economy of training in coordinated market economies. First, by demonstrating that cooperation among employers was a recent achievement that required the creation of specific, targeted mechanisms, it suggests that a cooperative outcome is difficult to attain, even amid the generally hospitable institutional environment characteristic of these economies. Second, it demonstrates that the employer collective action problem with respect to the initial training of apprentices differs from that posed by the additional raining of experienced workers. This means that even within a single economy, there are several varieties of training politics, each characterized by different patterns of cooperation and conflict; this further complicates the task of creating a coordinated training regime.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Bowman, 2005. "Employers and the Politics of Skill Formation in a Coordinated Market Economy: Collective Action and Class Conflict in Norway," Politics & Society, , vol. 33(4), pages 567-594, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:4:p:567-594
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329205280925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329205280925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329205280925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:4:p:567-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.