IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v33y2005i3p449-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translatio versus Concessio

Author

Listed:
  • David Ellerman

    (Economics Department of the University of California, Riverside, david@ellerman.org)

Abstract

Liberalism is based on the juxtaposition of consent to coercion. Autocracy and slavery were based on coercion whereas today’s political democracy and economic “employment system†are based on consent to voluntary contracts. This article retrieves an almost forgotten dark side of contractarian thought that based autocracy and slavery on explicit or implicit voluntary contracts. The democratic and antislavery movements forged arguments not simply in favor of consent but arguments that voluntary contracts to alienate (translatio) aspects of personhood were invalid—which made the underlying rights inalienable. Once understood, those arguments apply as well to today’s self-rental contract, the employer-employee contract.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ellerman, 2005. "Translatio versus Concessio," Politics & Society, , vol. 33(3), pages 449-480, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:3:p:449-480
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329205278463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329205278463
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329205278463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:3:p:449-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.