IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v33y2005i2p253-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralizing Government and Decentering Gender: Lessons from Local Government Reform in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Jo Beall

    (Development Studies Institute (DESTIN) at the London School of Economics, J.Beall@lse.ac.uk)

Abstract

Localization and decentralization are frequently presented as good for women. However, the reality is not so clear cut. Local government is the tier that is closest to people, but relationships, structures, and processes of local governance can limit both the space for women’s participation and the policy potential for addressing gender issues. The experience of democratic reform in South Africa is invariably held up as an example of good practice in advancing gender equity in governance. Critically drawing on this experience, the article points out some of the paradoxes for women and gender equity that arise from decentralization strategies and governance at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Jo Beall, 2005. "Decentralizing Government and Decentering Gender: Lessons from Local Government Reform in South Africa," Politics & Society, , vol. 33(2), pages 253-276, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:2:p:253-276
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329205275194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329205275194
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329205275194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Marie Goetz & Rob Jenkins, 2018. "Feminist Activism and the Politics of Reform: When and Why Do States Respond to Demands for Gender Equality Policies?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 714-734, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:2:p:253-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.