IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v32y2004i1p79-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Basic Income, Stakeholder Grants, and Class Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Olin Wright

Abstract

Both Basic Income and Stakeholder Grants, if sufficiently generous, are likely to have an impact on the balance of power between classes: Stakeholder Grants make it easier for individuals to become self-employed and “own their own means of production,†thus reducing their dependency on capitalists; by unconditionally guaranteeing each individual an above-poverty standard of living, a generous Basic Income gives every worker an exit-option from the labor market, thus also reducing their dependence on capitalists. Of the two proposals, however, Basic Income is likely to have the more profound effect on relative class power for several reasons: many people will “blow†their stakes either through bad luck or waste; basic income increases the possibility of engaging in decommodified, nonmarket activity, thus expanding the sphere of economic practices outside of capitalism; basic income increases the capacity of collective struggle by providing a guaranteed strike fund for workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Olin Wright, 2004. "Basic Income, Stakeholder Grants, and Class Analysis," Politics & Society, , vol. 32(1), pages 79-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:32:y:2004:i:1:p:79-87
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329203261099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329203261099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329203261099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:32:y:2004:i:1:p:79-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.