IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v30y2002i3p497-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associational Membership and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective: a Note on the Problems of Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • LAURA MORALES DIEZ de ULZURRUN

Abstract

Organizational membership seems to be linked to a more participatory and informed political culture, to foster electoral participation, and to promote positive feelings toward democracy. More recently, the social capital and associative democracy debates have introduced new arguments about the positive effects of associational involvement. However, little attention has been paid to the problems of measuring associational involvement and to their consequences for our theories. This article discusses the various problems of validity and reliability of our measurements of associational membership. It is shown that different questionnaire formats produce substantially different results. The article also addresses the issue of measurement errors and emphasizes the problems they introduce when doing cross-national comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • LAURA MORALES DIEZ de ULZURRUN, 2002. "Associational Membership and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective: a Note on the Problems of Measurement," Politics & Society, , vol. 30(3), pages 497-523, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:30:y:2002:i:3:p:497-523
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329202030003005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329202030003005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329202030003005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:gig:joupla:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:63-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Enzo Loner, 2016. "A new way of looking at old things. An application of Guttman errors analysis to the study of environmental concern," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 823-847, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:30:y:2002:i:3:p:497-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.