IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v30y2002i1p5-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quandaries of War and of Union in North America: 1763 to 1861

Author

Listed:
  • NORMAN SCHOFIELD

Abstract

The key theoretical idea underlying this article is that an institutional equilibrium in the economic domain can be destroyed or transformed by rapid belief changes in the political domain. Events circa 1776, 1787, and 1860 in the United States are all examined in an attempt to understand the interaction between these economic and political transformations. More explicitly, the author views the economic domain as fundamentally three dimensional, characterized by the use of land, labor, and capital. In contrast to general economic reasoning, he considers the equilibrium in this domain to be institutional, rather than the consequence of the interplay of economic forces. Threats, generated in the political domain, have consequences in the economic domain, and these in turn induce belief changes in the political domain. Such belief changes may bring about war, or constitutional disequilibrium, leading possibly to a new political economic stasis.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Schofield, 2002. "Quandaries of War and of Union in North America: 1763 to 1861," Politics & Society, , vol. 30(1), pages 5-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:30:y:2002:i:1:p:5-49
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329202030001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329202030001002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329202030001002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:30:y:2002:i:1:p:5-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.