IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v29y2001i4p589-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free-Splitting Revisited: Concealing Surplus Value in the Temporary Employment Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • GEORGE GONOS

Abstract

Based on a historical study of fee regulation in the employment agency business, the claim that temporary help agencies charge “no fees†to workers is challenged. It is found that the claim rests on technical changes in the statutory definitions of fee and employment agency won through industry lobbying efforts, changes that simply mask traditional fee-charging methods. The article traces the evolution of fee-charging practices in the post-World War II period and points to a new version of “fee splitting†as a prevalent wage setting practice in the staffing industry. The implications of these developments for wage depression and income redistribution are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • George Gonos, 2001. "Free-Splitting Revisited: Concealing Surplus Value in the Temporary Employment Relationship," Politics & Society, , vol. 29(4), pages 589-611, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:29:y:2001:i:4:p:589-611
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329201029004005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329201029004005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329201029004005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angelo A. Alonzo & Arthur B. Simon, 2008. "Have stethoscope, will travel: contingent employment among physician health care providers in the United States," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(4), pages 635-654, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:29:y:2001:i:4:p:589-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.