IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v29y2025i2p142-160.html

Audit Attribute-based Capital Financing Decision in NSE-listed Companies: Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Juhendra Debbarma
  • Chinmoy Roy
  • Manik Chakraborty

Abstract

As traditional capital financing decisions are facing some new challenges, audit attribute-based capital financing decisions, with their task structure and decision aids, have been widely deployed in recent years. However, how audit attributes impact capital financing decisions is not yet established and still presents a number of intervention issues, particularly in the Indian context. This study encompassed an analysis of 113 firms listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) over a period of 9 years, ranging between 2016 and 2024. Panel data estimation techniques were applied, aligning with established theories concerning audit attributes and capital structure. In this study, leverage as a proxy for capital structure is taken as a criterion measure, while the audit committee size, audit committee independence, audit meetings and audit quality are taken as independent measures. Additionally, control variables, namely firm size, return on assets, firm growth, liquidity, profitability, tangibility and firm risk, were treated for the study. The empirical findings revealed that audit quality (AQ) has a positive significant relationship with leverage in the fixed effects model, demonstrating that firms with high-quality audits send a strong signal to creditors and investors that the company’s financial statements are accurate and reliable. This, in turn, builds trust and confidence in the firm’s financial health, making it easier for the firm to raise debt capital. However, the generalized method of moments model showed that AQ has a negative significant relationship with leverage, indicating that firms with higher debt levels may engage in lower-quality audits due to cost constraints, higher risk profiles or the desire to avoid scrutiny. The present study concludes that an enhancement of audit attributes can support a firm by making its decisions explicit towards external debt in providing optimal capital structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhendra Debbarma & Chinmoy Roy & Manik Chakraborty, 2025. "Audit Attribute-based Capital Financing Decision in NSE-listed Companies: Evidence from India," Paradigm, , vol. 29(2), pages 142-160, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:142-160
    DOI: 10.1177/09718907251379050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09718907251379050
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09718907251379050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    2. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Agency Problems and Residual Claims," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 327-349, June.
    3. Arellano, Manuel & Bover, Olympia, 1995. "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 29-51, July.
    4. Murray Z. Frank & Vidhan K. Goyal, 2009. "Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors Are Reliably Important?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-37, March.
    5. Dan Dhaliwal & Vic Naiker & Farshid Navissi, 2010. "The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 787-827, September.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    7. Musa Mangena & Richard Pike, 2005. "The effect of audit committee shareholding, financial expertise and size on interim financial disclosures," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 327-349.
    8. Peter Agyemang-Mintah & Hannu Schadewitz, 2018. "Audit committee adoption and firm value: evidence from UK financial institutions," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 205-226, March.
    9. Hong Li & David Hay & David Lau, 2019. "Assessing the impact of the new auditor’s report," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(1), pages 110-132, March.
    10. Weerapong Kitiwong & Naruanard Sarapaivanich, 2020. "Consequences of the implementation of expanded audit reports with key audit matters (KAMs) on audit quality," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 1095-1119, July.
    11. Peter Baxter & Julie Cotter, 2009. "Audit committees and earnings quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(2), pages 267-290, June.
    12. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    13. Xin Chang & André F. Gygax & Elaine Oon & Hong Feng Zhang, 2008. "Audit quality, auditor compensation and initial public offering underpricing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(3), pages 391-416, September.
    14. Norman Mohd Saleh & Takiah Mohd Iskandar & Mohd Mohid Rahmat, 2007. "Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: evidence from Malaysia," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 147-163, April.
    15. Frank, Murray Z. & Goyal, Vidhan K., 2003. "Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 217-248, February.
    16. repec:eme:par000:par-02-2018-0011 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lauren C. Reid & Joseph V. Carcello & Chan Li & Terry L. Neal & Jere R. Francis, 2019. "Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1501-1539, September.
    18. Mark DeFond & David H. Erkens & Jieying Zhang, 2017. "Do Client Characteristics Really Drive the Big N Audit Quality Effect? New Evidence from Propensity Score Matching," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3628-3649, November.
    19. David Roodman, 2009. "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(1), pages 86-136, March.
    20. Myers, Stewart C., 1977. "Determinants of corporate borrowing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 147-175, November.
    21. M. Akhtaruddin & Hasnah Haron, 2010. "Board ownership, audit committees’ effectiveness, and corporate voluntary disclosures," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 245-259, September.
    22. Anderson, Ronald C. & Mansi, Sattar A. & Reeb, David M., 2004. "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-342, September.
    23. Klein, April, 2002. "Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 375-400, August.
    24. Pamela Kent & James Routledge & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 171-195, March.
    25. repec:eme:maj000:02686900610680530 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Zahid Bashir & Ghulam Ali Bhatti & Asad Javed, 2020. "Corporate governance and capital structure as driving force for financial performance: Evidence from non-financial listed companies in Pakistan," Business Review, School of Economics and Social Sciences, IBA Karachi, vol. 15(1), pages 108-133, January-J.
    27. John R. Graham, 2000. "How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(5), pages 1901-1941, October.
    28. Irene Karamanou & Nikos Vafeas, 2005. "The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 453-486, June.
    29. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    30. Charles J. P. Chen & Xijia Su & Ronald Zhao, 2000. "An Emerging Market's Reaction to Initial Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 429-455, September.
    31. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    32. Chau, Gerald K. & Gray, Sidney J., 2002. "Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 247-265.
    33. Wendy Beekes & Philip Brown & Wenwen Zhan & Qiyu Zhang, 2016. "Corporate Governance, Companies’ Disclosure Practices and Market Transparency: A Cross Country Study," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3-4), pages 263-297, March.
    34. Opler, Tim & Pinkowitz, Lee & Stulz, Rene & Williamson, Rohan, 1999. "The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 3-46, April.
    35. Saed Ahmed Sulub & Zalailah Salleh & Hafiza Aishah Hashim, 2020. "Corporate governance, SSB strength and the use of internal audit function by Islamic banks," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 152-167, January.
    36. Myers, Stewart C, 1984. "The Capital Structure Puzzle," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(3), pages 575-592, July.
    37. M. Akhtaruddin & Hasnah Haron, 2010. "Board ownership, audit committees' effectiveness and corporate voluntary disclosures," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 68-82, May.
    38. repec:eme:maj000:maj-09-2019-2410 is not listed on IDEAS
    39. Albert Danso & Theophilus Lartey & Samuel Fosu & Samuel Owusu-Agyei & Moshfique Uddin, 2019. "Leverage and firm investment: the role of information asymmetry and growth," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(1), pages 56-73, March.
    40. Li, Jing & Mangena, Musa & Pike, Richard, 2012. "The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 98-110.
    41. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    42. Yuanto Kusnadi & Kwong Sin Leong & Themin Suwardy & Jiwei Wang, 2016. "Audit Committees and Financial Reporting Quality in Singapore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 197-214, November.
    43. M. Akhtaruddin & Hasnah Haron, 2010. "Board ownership, audit committees’ effectiveness, and corporate voluntary disclosures," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 245-259, September.
    44. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    45. M. Akhtaruddin & Hasnah Haron, 2010. "Board ownership, audit committees' effectiveness and corporate voluntary disclosures," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 68-82, May.
    46. Uwalomwa UWUIGBE, 2014. "Corporate governance and capital structure: evidence from listed firms in Nigeria stock exchange," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1, pages 5-14, April.
    47. Pinprapa Sangchan & Ahsan Habib & Haiyan Jiang & Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, 2020. "Fair Value Exposure, Changes in Fair Value and Audit Fees: Evidence from the Australian Real Estate Industry," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(2), pages 123-143, June.
    48. Puan Yatim & Pamela Kent & Peter Clarkson, 2006. "Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(7), pages 757-782, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mário Santos & António Moreira & Elisabete Vieira, 2014. "Ownership concentration, contestability, family firms, and capital structure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(4), pages 1063-1107, November.
    2. Temimi, Akram & Zeitun, Rami & Mimouni, Karim, 2016. "How does the tax status of a country impact capital structure? Evidence from the GCC region," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 37, pages 71-89.
    3. Elif Acar & Gamze Vural & Emin Hüseyin Çetenak, 2020. "Evidence for Financial Hierarchy Theory in Capital Structure Decisions: Data from BIST Companies," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 29-50.
    4. Le, Thi Phuong Vy & Phan, Thi Bich Nguyet, 2017. "Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from a small transition country," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 710-726.
    5. Mohamed, Hisham Hanifa & Masih, Mansur & Bacha, Obiyathulla I., 2015. "Why do issuers issue Sukuk or conventional bond? Evidence from Malaysian listed firms using partial adjustment models," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 233-252.
    6. Zhang, Dongyang & Liu, Deqiang, 2017. "Determinants of the capital structure of Chinese non-listed enterprises: Is TFP efficient?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 179-202.
    7. Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2017. "Determinants of capital structure in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 105-113.
    8. Alves, Paulo & Couto, Eduardo Barbosa & Francisco, Paulo Morais, 2015. "Board of directors’ composition and capital structure," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-32.
    9. Ebrahim, M. Shahid & Girma, Sourafel & Shah, M. Eskandar & Williams, Jonathan, 2014. "Dynamic capital structure and political patronage: The case of Malaysia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 117-128.
    10. Im, Hyun Joong & Kang, Ya & Shon, Janghoon, 2020. "How does uncertainty influence target capital structure?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Elsas, Ralf & Florysiak, David, 2008. "Empirical Capital Structure Research: New Ideas, Recent Evidence, and Methodological Issues," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 4743, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    12. Niluthpaul Sarker & Roushanara Islam, 2021. "Issues on Bank’s Capital Structure and Profitability: A Developing Country Context," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 86-104.
    13. Alves, Paulo & Couto, Eduardo & Francisco, Paulo, 2014. "Board of directors’ composition and financing choices," MPRA Paper 52973, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2014.
    14. Dang, Viet Anh & Kim, Minjoo & Shin, Yongcheol, 2015. "In search of robust methods for dynamic panel data models in empirical corporate finance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 84-98.
    15. Firano, Zakaria & Filali adib, Fatine, 2022. "Optimal Capital structure and financial stability," MPRA Paper 115790, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2022.
    16. Biswajit Ghose & Kailash Chandra Kabra, 2019. "Firm Profitability and Adjustment of Capital Structure: Indian Evidence," Vision, , vol. 23(3), pages 297-308, September.
    17. Wu, Xueping & Au Yeung, Chau Kin, 2012. "Firm growth type and capital structure persistence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3427-3443.
    18. Hidaya Lawati & Khaled Hussainey & Roza Sagitova, 2021. "Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 557-594, August.
    19. Clemente-Almendros, José A. & Sogorb-Mira, Francisco, 2018. "Costs of debt, tax benefits and a new measure of non-debt tax shields: examining debt conservatism in Spanish listed firms," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 162-175.
    20. Ömer Tuğsal Doruk & Bi Irie Claude Martial Gohore, 2024. "A Financing Constraints Paradox? Internal Finance and Capital Structure Link for Tourism Firms: Asian Emerging Market evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:142-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.