IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/millen/v16y2025i2p209-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Party Reputation, Moral Expectations and Voting Behaviour in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Youn Ki
  • Eunbin Chung

Abstract

Do voters punish political parties for unsatisfactory performance on issues and traits the parties are expected to excel at? Issue and trait ownership theories stipulate that parties establish reputations regarding policy issues and attributes; voters then reward or punish the party depending on how much voter expectations were met. However, reactions to politicians’ performances may vary depending on voters’ moral intuitions and party affiliations. Analyzing survey and news data on the 2021 mayoral byelection in Seoul, South Korea, we find that party reputation and the expectation gap affected votes. Also, as moral foundations theory (MFT) suggests, differing moral priorities of liberal and conservative voters explain variation in responses to ethical violations. Our findings suggest the applicability of the party ownership framework and MFT in a newer, non-Western democracy. This study contributes to our understanding of voting behaviour in South Korea, with an emphasis on reputation, expectation gaps and moral intuitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Youn Ki & Eunbin Chung, 2025. "Party Reputation, Moral Expectations and Voting Behaviour in South Korea," Millennial Asia, , vol. 16(2), pages 209-234, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:209-234
    DOI: 10.1177/09763996231179507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09763996231179507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09763996231179507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:millen:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:209-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.